Some links on our site may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.
Nothing on this page is medical advice. I am not a doctor and not a trainer. Talk to a qualified professional before you start a strength program, and follow the manufacturer’s instructions and weight limits for any equipment you own.
Published July 7, 2026. Updated September 1, 2026.
For most of two decades the Bowflex SelectTech 552 was the easy answer. Somebody would say they had no room for a rack and twenty minutes at best, and you’d say: get the 552. Fifteen weight settings a hand, a dial instead of a bag of spring collars, a footprint the size of a doormat. I have given that answer myself.
On June 5, 2025, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission published recall 25-311. About 3,844,200 BowFlex 552 and 1090 adjustable dumbbells, sold as early as 2004 and as late as May 2025, because — in the commission’s words — “the weight plates can dislodge from the handle during use, posing an impact hazard.” That is not a bad batch in one corner of the product’s life. That is the product’s life.
The recall is keyed to serial-number ranges rather than to every unit ever shipped, and the serial number is printed on the base of each dumbbell. So the first job for anyone who owns a pair is a two-minute one: read the number off the base and check it against the ranges BowFlex publishes. The second job is understanding what you get if it matches, because that answer is not the same for everybody.
The remedy depends on who sold it to you
Recall 25-311 splits owners into two groups by seller, and the two groups are offered different things for the same defect.
If your set came from Nautilus, Inc. or BowFlex Inc. — anything sold from 2004 through April 2024 — the CPSC notice says you are offered “a prorated voucher and a one-year JRNY digital fitness membership,” with return shipping prepaid. A voucher, prorated, spendable on BowFlex.com. If your set came from Johnson Health Tech Trading, which took over sales in May 2024, you are offered a replacement set or a voucher for the full purchase price, plus the same year of JRNY.
Now the sizes of those two groups. The CPSC puts the whole recall at about 3,844,200 units and says in its own headline that 3.7 million of them were sold by Nautilus. Subtract, and Johnson Health Tech’s share is roughly 144,200 units — about 3.8 percent of the recall. Round it and it comes out at 96 percent of recalled dumbbells on the prorated-voucher side and 4 percent on the replacement side.
| Who sold it | Sold when | Units (approx.) | Share of the recall | What recall 25-311 offers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nautilus, Inc. / BowFlex Inc. | 2004 through April 2024 | 3,700,000 | ~96% | Prorated refund voucher toward a purchase on BowFlex.com, plus one year of JRNY |
| Johnson Health Tech Trading | May 2024 through May 2025 | 144,200 | ~4% | Replacement dumbbells, or a voucher for the full purchase price, plus one year of JRNY |
You might reasonably assume the split tracks risk — that the older units were the dangerous ones and the newer ones were mostly fine. The report counts in the same notice say otherwise. Nautilus logged 337 reports of plates dislodging, 111 of them causing injuries the CPSC lists as concussions, abrasions, broken toes and contusions. Johnson Health Tech logged 12 reports and no injuries. Set those against the unit counts and the rates land close together: one report per roughly 11,000 units on the Nautilus side, one per roughly 12,000 on the Johnson Health Tech side. The defect does not care whose logo was on the invoice.
What the split does track is corporate history. BowFlex Inc., the renamed Nautilus, filed for Chapter 11 protection on March 4, 2024. On April 15, 2024 the bankruptcy court approved the sale of substantially all of its assets to Johnson Health Tech for $37.5 million in cash. So 3.7 million pairs of dumbbells were sold by a company that has since been through bankruptcy and sold for parts, and 144,200 were sold by the company that bought it. Same mechanism, same plastic, same hazard. Different claim.
Neither the CPSC notice nor BowFlex’s own recall page publishes the proration formula. I went looking for it. What is published is a claim form, a serial-number field, prepaid return shipping and a stated deadline of June 4, 2028 for the JRNY portion of the offer. What a 2011 purchase is worth in 2026 under that formula is not written down anywhere I could find, and I am not going to invent a number for it. If you own an older pair, file the claim and find out — that is genuinely the only way to know.
Your parts warranty ran out years before the recall did
Here is the thing that makes the recall the whole story rather than a footnote to it. BowFlex lists parts coverage on the current 552 at two years, and Garage Gym Reviews records the same two-year term on the SelectTech 552 it reviewed, with the added note that dropping the dumbbells risks voiding it. Two years is a normal warranty for this category. It is also a rounding error against a 21-year sales window.
| If you bought in | Two-year parts coverage ended | Years you owned them with no warranty before the June 2025 recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2006 | 19 |
| 2010 | 2012 | 13 |
| 2015 | 2017 | 8 |
| 2020 | 2022 | 3 |
| 2023 | 2025 | 0 |
| May 2024 – May 2025 | 2026 – 2027 | still inside coverage |
Read down that last column and you can see why the recall matters more than the warranty for almost everyone who owns these. For the great majority of the 3.7 million Nautilus-era sets, the warranty had been dead for the better part of a decade by the time anybody published a hazard notice. The recall is the only live remedy those owners have, and it is the prorated one.
There is a question sitting underneath all of this that I could not get a clean answer to: whether Johnson Health Tech honors Nautilus-era warranty claims at all, on any product, as a matter of policy. The asset purchase was a bankruptcy sale, the press release announcing court approval says nothing about warranties or existing customers, and I found no published statement either way. The recall page’s own structure — a weaker remedy for the Nautilus era, a stronger one for its own — is the closest thing to an answer on the record.
Three hundred forty-nine reports, one mechanism
I have not lifted these. Nobody here has. This operation researches products, it does not test them, and what our reviews are built from is written out on our editorial standards page. So everything below is what owners and independent reviewers report, with the counts and the sources named, and none of it is presented as ours.
The CPSC filing is the largest single body of owner reports anyone has published on this product: 349 reports in total across both sellers, 111 of them involving injury, all describing one failure — a weight plate coming off the handle mid-rep. Against 3.84 million units that is roughly one report per 11,000 and one injury per 34,000. Low. Not zero, and the outcome when it happens is a plate the weight of a bowling ball leaving your hand at chest height.
Garage Gym Reviews had named the part before the recall did. Their review of the 552 describes the interior connectors as plastic pieces that “have shown that they can crack, potentially dropping a weight plate,” and separately lists the rubber grip spinning and pulling off the handle, and the plastic stand cracking. That is an independent reviewer identifying the same mechanism the commission eventually counted 349 times.
Everyday owner sentiment runs the other way, and it is worth holding both. Sam’s Club shows a 4.8 average across 800 ratings for the SelectTech 552, distributed 694 five-star, 77 four-star, 7 three-star, 6 two-star and 16 one-star. That is 771 of 800 ratings — 96 percent — at four stars or better. Most people who buy these like them a great deal, which is exactly how a product stays the default recommendation for two decades.
What I cannot give you is an order of failure. No source I found publishes a time-sequenced record for this dumbbell — grip first, then connector, then tray, or any other ordering — and building one out of anecdotes would be making it up. The honest version is narrower: one mechanism accounts for the injuries, it is a plastic part inside the handle, and it does not announce itself first.
What the whole setup costs once the stand is in the room
The set you can buy new today is not the one in the recall. BowFlex now sells the Results Series 552, which it offers as the replacement dumbbell in the recall remedy itself. On BowFlex’s own site as I write this it lists at $479 and is discounted to $399, holds the same 5-to-52.5-pound range across fifteen settings, measures 16.9 by 8.3 by 9 inches per dumbbell, and carries two years on parts.
Almost nobody keeps these on the floor for long. Picking 52.5 pounds up off the carpet is its own exercise, and the trays sit low. The stand BowFlex sells for them is $199, which takes a $479 purchase to $678 — or $598 at the sale price. That is the number to plan around, not the one on the product page.
The coverage on that $678 is where it gets strange.
Ten years on the welded frame of the stand. Thirty days on the parts of it. One year on the phone holder. Two years on the dumbbells, which are the only thing in the room with a moving mechanism inside them. Plot that across a ten-year horizon and the stand’s frame is the single component still covered in year nine, while everything that adjusts, clips or bolts has been on your own dime since the first month or the second year.
For context on what people paid for the recalled generation, the CPSC lists a range of “$200 and $800” across the 552 and 1090 over twenty-one years of retail. So a prorated voucher is being calculated against a purchase price that could be almost anything, from a deep Black Friday 552 to a full-freight 1090.
Prices are approximate, current as of publication, and change frequently — confirm the latest price with the retailer before buying.
The dial is still the reason to want one
None of the above means the design was wrong. It solved a real problem and it still does.
BowFlex publishes the full ladder: 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 17.5, 20, 22.5, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50 and 52.5 pounds. Read it closely and you’ll see where the engineering attention went. Below 25 pounds the steps are 2.5 pounds; above it they are fives. That is the right way round. A five-pound jump on a 20-pound lateral raise is a 25 percent increase and you will fail the set; a five-pound jump on a 45-pound row is barely a change of mood. Most rivals step in fives the whole way up, and that fine bottom end is the single most underrated thing about the 552 family.
The footprint is real too. Two trays side by side occupy about the space of a bath mat, against fifteen pairs of fixed dumbbells and the rack to hold them. And at 16.9 inches long, the dumbbell is exactly as long at 5 pounds as it is at 52.5 — a fixed handle length is the structural price of the whole idea, and it shows up on hammer curls and anything that passes close to your ribs.
Four training styles this dumbbell is wrong for
- Anything where you let go of the weight. Skip this if your training involves dropping dumbbells at the end of a hard set, or bailing out of a press. The failure the CPSC counted is a plastic part inside a handle, and impact is not what that part is for. Buy rubber hex or steel.
- Pressing above 52.5 pounds a hand. Skip this if you are already there or will be within a year. The ceiling arrives fast on rows and legs, and buying twice costs more than buying up once.
- Garage gyms with floor space to spare. Skip this if storage is not your constraint. The entire premium here buys compactness. Used fixed dumbbells cost less, outlive everybody, and have nothing inside them to crack.
- Shared households where nobody re-docks anything. Skip this if the dumbbells will get put back roughly rather than seated in the tray. The dial only turns when the handle is home, and “roughly” is how mechanisms get forced.
If you want steel under your hand
PowerBlock Elite USA 90. The one I would look at hardest against the 552. PowerBlock’s own site prices the 50-pound configuration at $469 — ten dollars under the 552’s list — the 70 at $668 and the 90 at $867, and covers all of them with a five-year limited warranty for residential use. Five years against BowFlex’s two, at essentially the same entry price. PowerBlock also states that the weight plates are made in Owatonna, Minnesota from U.S.-sourced steel, with handles, selector pins and accessories manufactured internationally. The boxy caged handle is genuinely divisive and you should hold one before you commit. Skip this if the cage feels wrong in your grip, because that never improves.
BowFlex Results Series 1090 or 90. The in-family answer if 52.5 is your ceiling problem: 10 to 90 pounds, $799 list and $699 on sale, and three years on parts rather than two. The older SelectTech 1090 sits in the same recall as the 552, so a used 1090 is not an automatic safe upgrade — check the serial number before you buy secondhand. Skip this if you are buying secondhand and cannot check a serial number.
NordicTrack 55 lb. Select-A-Weight. This is the loser of the group, and not because of how it lifts. NordicTrack’s own product page shows it in stock and lists a fifteen-step ladder from 10 to 55 pounds, but displays no price I could read. Best Buy lists it at $299.99 under model NTSAW11016 with a 4.6 average across 20 reviews, and says it is no longer available in new condition. Target shows it out of stock with a single review. A set you cannot reliably price, cannot reliably buy, and that has twenty reviews behind it after years on sale is not something I can point anyone at. Skip this one outright unless you find it discounted from a seller who will take it back.
If you are shopping this category from the beginning rather than replacing a recalled pair, my roundup of adjustable dumbbells for small home gyms covers the wider field, and the six pieces of home-gym gear I think earn their floor space is the honest starting list if the dumbbells are the first thing you’re buying. More in Fitness & Exercise Gear.
If you’re buying one this month
Two different people are reading this, and they need opposite things.
If you already own a SelectTech 552, go read the serial number off the base tonight. If it falls in the recalled ranges, stop using them and file the claim, and go in expecting a prorated voucher rather than a check — the odds are about 25 to 1 that you are on the Nautilus side of that split. Whatever the voucher comes to, it is more than the zero your two-year warranty has been worth since some point in the last decade.
If you are buying new, the Results Series 552 is a reasonable purchase at $399 and a thinner one at $479, on the same terms it always had: you are paying a premium for compactness, the fine 2.5-pound steps under 25 pounds are the best part of the design, and the handle length never changes. Budget $678 rather than $479, because the stand is not optional in practice. Understand that two years of parts coverage is what stands behind a mechanism whose predecessor generated 349 hazard reports, and that the company standing behind it bought the brand out of bankruptcy in 2024 and has no published long-term record of its own yet. That is not a reason to avoid it. It is a reason to keep the receipt and the serial number somewhere you can find them.
And if you have the floor space, buy iron. Nothing inside a fixed dumbbell has ever needed a recall.
Sources: the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recall notice 25-311 for units, reports, injuries, sale dates, price range and remedies; Garage Gym Reviews for the named failure points and the older model’s warranty term. Prices, warranty terms, dimensions and weight ladders come from BowFlex’s and PowerBlock’s own product pages; rating counts from Sam’s Club, Best Buy and Target, named where used.
